Robotic ARTAS Hair Transplant vs FUE Surgery - Understanding the Differences
As a medical professional at My Hair UK, I frequently engage with patients exploring their options for hair restoration. Among the most common methods discussed are Robotic ARTAS hair transplant and Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) surgery. While both techniques aim to restore hair, they differ considerably in their approach, benefits, and outcomes. In this article, I will delve into the nuances between these two methods, particularly in light of the cost and effectiveness in the evolving landscape of hair transplant surgery.
At My Hair UK we only offer the Sapphire Blade FUE procedure as our surgeons have witnessed the results from robotic surgery and agree that manual FUE gives superior outcomes.
What Is Hair Transplant Surgery?
Hair transplant surgery is a procedure designed to relocate hair follicles from a donor area, typically the back of the scalp, to areas experiencing hair loss. The two most prevalent methods of hair transplantation are FUE and robotic-assisted transplants like ARTAS. At My Hair UK we only offer Sapphire Blade FUE as our surgeons have witnessed the results from robotic surgery and agree that manual FUE gives superior outcomes.
Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE)
FUE is a minimally invasive procedure in which individual hair follicles are extracted from the donor area using a specialized punch tool. This technique is widely recognized for its precision and the absence of a linear scar, allowing patients the freedom to choose shorter hairstyles if they desire.
Robotic ARTAS Hair Transplant
The ARTAS robotic system represents recent advancement in hair restoration technology being introduced around 2015-18. It combines traditional FUE techniques with robotic assistance, aiming to enhance the precision of follicle extraction. The procedure begins similarly to FUE, with local anaesthetic administered and the donor area prepared. The ARTAS system uses advanced imaging to identify suitable hair follicles for extraction and then employs robotic arms to perform the extraction, but has some severe limitations. ARTAS is only really effective on people with dark and straight hair with light skin as that is the only type the robotic system can easily identify.
Why FUE Is Preferred Over ARTAS
While both methods are capable of restoring hair, there are several reasons why FUE is often viewed as the superior option:
Precision and Skill
FUE relies on the expertise of the surgeon to select and transplant hair follicles, ensuring a natural-looking result. The tactile feedback experienced by a skilled surgeon allows for precise control over the angle, depth, and placement of each graft, ultimately resulting in a more aesthetically pleasing outcome. Every patient is different and the ARTAS system give a standardised look for each patient, it is not able to vary the result to an individuals preferences.
Versatility
FUE is suitable for various hair types, including straight, curly, and textured hair. In contrast, ARTAS is most effective on straight, dark hair, which limits its application for many patients. A skilled technician can identify and adapt to all hair types and outcomes.
Reduced Risk of Follicle Damage
The ARTAS system uses larger punch sizes compared to manual FUE methods. This can lead to a higher risk of damage to surrounding follicles and may result in unsatisfactory healing. FUE employs smaller punches, minimizing trauma to the donor area and preserving the health of existing hair follicles.
Tailored Techniques
FUE allows for a customized approach to each patient’s needs. Skilled surgeons can adapt their techniques based on the patient’s unique hair characteristics and desired results, providing a personalized experience that robotic systems may not offer.
Cost-Effectiveness
Although ARTAS was introduced to reduce costs by lowering staffing requirements, the overall decrease in FUE prices in recent years has rendered it a more attractive option for patients seeking quality hair restoration. As a result, many clinics no longer utilize ARTAS due to its limitations and the growing preference for FUE, with the old ARTAS systems being shipped off to clinics abroad.
The Evolution of Hair Transplant Costs
Initially, ARTAS was developed with the intention of providing a cost-effective alternative to traditional FUE by reducing the number of staff required during surgery. However, in the six years since ARTAS was introduced, the typical hair transplant cost in the UK has shifted significantly.
FUE prices have decreased as clinics have refined their techniques, improved efficiency, and adopted competitive pricing strategies. Consequently, many UK clinics have opted to forgo the ARTAS system in favour of FUE due to its limitations and the superior results often achieved through manual techniques.
FAQs About Hair Transplants
How long does it take to see results from a hair transplant?
Patients can expect to see new hair growth around four months post-surgery. However, full results are typically realized between 12 to 18 months after the procedure.
Which technique is better: ARTAS or FUE?
FUE is generally regarded as the superior technique due to its adaptability, precision, and the personal touch provided by skilled surgeons. The human element in FUE allows for greater customization that robotic systems cannot replicate.
Are there risks associated with ARTAS?
Yes, while ARTAS is designed to enhance precision, it comes with limitations such as a reduced effectiveness on certain hair types and a higher risk of damage to surrounding follicles. These factors can impact the overall success of the procedure.
How do hair transplant costs compare?
Hair transplant costs have decreased significantly since ARTAS was introduced, making FUE a more appealing option for patients seeking high-quality results without the limitations associated with robotic systems.
Is there any preparation required before a hair transplant?
Patients are advised to avoid alcohol and tobacco in the weeks leading up to the surgery to promote optimal healing. Following the surgeon’s post-operative care instructions is also crucial for achieving the best results.
Conclusion
In summary, while both robotic ARTAS and FUE hair transplant techniques offer solutions for hair restoration, the benefits of FUE—particularly regarding precision, versatility, and the personalised results provided by experienced surgeons position it as the preferred option. At My Hair UK, we are dedicated to delivering the highest quality care and results for our patients, ensuring that your journey towards hair restoration is met with expertise and compassion.
If you are considering a hair transplant, I invite you to schedule a consultation at My Hair UK. Our team is prepared to provide personalized advice and tailored treatment plans, ensuring you have the support you need to make informed decisions about your hair restoration journey.
Get back to Great Hair
in 3 Easy Steps:
01
Arrange Free Consultation
Speak to one of our specialist consultants for expert advice on our range of different hair loss treatments
02
Book Your Procedure
Place a deposit to reserve a time slot at one of the My Hair UK clinics across the UK
03
Attend Your Surgery
Arrive on the day and our specialist surgical team will look after your every need
